A Scandal Worse than Watergate?
I
just finished reading Injustice, a recently released book by J.
Christian Adams (copyright 2011, Regnery) that describes a widespread
scandal in Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of
Justice (DOJ). This is not a personal scandal like Watergate that
consisted of a failure of character, and political machinations, but
rather an officially supported undermining of the rule of law and of due
process of law. The threat posed by the Civil Rights Division not only
undermines the rights of Americans of all colors, but also threatens
the integrity of the entire electoral process, especially in 2012.
The
scandal does not consist of incompetence, or laziness, or a lack of
intellect, but has its roots in the rejection of honesty, integrity,
adherence to the rule of law, and to the American tradition of equal
justice under the law. Essentially, it consists of those charged with
law enforcement openly disregarding the law and in giving comfort and
aid to individuals who are actively working to subvert the integrity of
the electoral process.
This book is not written by some
ideologue, nor are the facts it cites disputed by men and women who have
fought long and valiantly to protect the rights of all Americans,
especially black Americans. In some cases the victims are men who
risked their own lives to advance the cause of equal rights for African
Americans in the 1960’s Civil Rights era. These honest men and women
understand that when you condone the undermining of the rights of any
member of American society, you threaten the rights of all members of
that society. When the rule of law is forsaken and man puts himself
above the lawbecause he “knows better than those who wrote the law” we
have started down the certain road to despotism. It is the rule of law
that protects everyone and underpins our free society. Without it,
freedom will die.
I won’t try to reveal all the details of the
Adams’ book. In fact, I strongly encourage you to get a copy and read
it. Here, however, are a few tidbits taken directly from Injustice.
Adams
documents repeated cases of attorneys in the Civil Rights Division of
the Department of Justice refusing to protect the rights of all voters,
but instead openly discriminating against and making it harder for
anyone but pro Democrat voters to get a fair shake. One of the cases
assigned to Adams was the New Black Panthers voter intimidation case in
Philadelphia. It was a cut and dried case captured on video by FOX News
that was seen by millions of Americans. When the militia dressed New
Black Panthers did not respond to the legal efforts of DOJ, all that was
needed to lock them up and put them in jail was to file for a summary
judgment. But that was vetoed by the Holder DOJ. When the legal team
at DOJ, including author Christian Adams was told to dismiss the case
against the New Black Panthers, they were stunned…
This was a blatant act of voter intimidation by a race-hate
group that was caught on tape and seen by the whole nation,
yet we were being ordered to do almost nothing about it. At
that moment it became clear to me that the people running the
division under the Obama administration were irredeemably
rotted and corrupt. Our superiors had sided with thugs, and
all we could do was silently look at each other; helpless and beaten.”
“…I told a good man who was willing to stick his neck out
to protect the right to vote that he could count on the DOJ.
And I was wrong. After a lifetime fighting for civil rights,
[Bartle] Bull deserved better from his government—and so
did the American people.”
Bartle
Bull is a veteran civil rights activist who has a long history of
working for Democratic candidates including Charles Evers in
Mississippi, Robert F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter. He was outraged by the
intimidation tactics of the New Black Panthers at the polls in
Philadelphia in 2010. Bull said to Adams…
“Bobby Kennedy didn’t die so jackbooted thugs could stand
out in front of the polls.”
“Bull noted that in his forty years of involvement in politics
and civil rights, he had ‘never encountered or heard of another
instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men
blocked the entrance to a polling location.”
In a sworn statement by Bull in front of a Senatorial Committee he said…
“To me, the presence and behavior of the two uniformed
men was an outrageous affront to American democracy and
the rights of voters to participate in an election without fear.
It would qualify as the most blatant form of voter intimidation
I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many
states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in
the 1960’s”
Attorney General Eric Holder was sanctimoniously outraged…
“When you compare what people endured in the South in the
60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and
to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened
in Philadelphia…to describe it in those terms I think does a
great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who
risked all, for my people.”
Adams responds…
“It was a telling moment. One might think the Attorney General
of the United States would regard the entire American people as ‘
his people.’ But no—for Holder, only one race of Americans is
his people.”
According to Adams…
“ the Civil Rights Division is now being utilized to energize
the president’s political base and alter the electoral ground
rules to benefit Obama’s campaign.”
The
Voter intimidation case of the New Black Panthers on election day 2008
was dismissed by DOJ even though there was abundant evidence of their
intimidation efforts at the polls. In countless similar cases of black
extremists threatening both black and white voters with physical harm,
the Civil Rights Division of DOJ didn’t just turn a blind eye to their
fraudulent activities, but in fact openly aided them in corrupting the
integrity of the election process. The result of turning a blind eye to
these illegal activities is that they have continued and expanded in
subsequent elections. They will likely play a major factor in the
outcome of the 2012 election.
Christian Adams fellow DOJ
attorney, Chris Coates, has a long record of fighting for the rights of
African Americans. However, when he sought to also protect the rights
of white Americans at the ballot box he was the subject of open
hostility by radicalized lawyers in the Justice Department. Here is an
excerpt from the Adams’ book…
“A Voting Section lawyer who entered the United States
as an illegal alien, Luz Lopez-Ortiz, referred to Coats in
a DOJ email as a ‘Klansman.’ For militants like Lopez-Ortiz,
enforcing the law equally was tantamount to joining a group
of racist terrorists.”
When
a blatant case of voter intimidation and vote fraud came to the
attention of Chris Coats he was told by Voting Section attorney, Avner
Shapiro…
“I didn’t come to work in the Civil Rights Division at the
Department of Justice to sue black people.”
Adams
also explains how the balanced hiring of attorneys from a wide variety
of viewpoints was scuttled once Eric Holder took charge as the Attorney
General.
“Under Eric Holder, if a candidate has not worked for a
leftist activist group or otherwise demonstrated some affinity
for the Left’s causes, he or she will not be hired at the Civil
Rights Division—period.”
The
new hires at DOJ weren’t just lawyers who believed in enforcing Civil
Rights laws on a colorblind basis or even attorneys who had a long
history of working on behalf of civil rights. To the contrary, these
new hires were men and women who had and have low regard for the law,
the US Constitution, and for equal justice under the law. Instead, they
see their position as an opportunity to wield power to advance their
radical agenda. And it has often gotten them into trouble.
According to Adams’ book, the current Civil Rights Division of the current DOJ…
“…has been sanctioned $4,107,595 for bringing frivolous
cases or engaging in misconduct, none of which was assessed
during the Bush administration.”
Requests
for information under the Freedom of Information Act (something that
Eric Holder recently sought permission to lie about) were treated
unequally at DOJ. While responses to FOIA inquiries from any party they
disagreed with regularly took six months or more for a response, their
radical allies often received same day service. According to Adams,
high ranking DOJ political appointee…
“…Julie Fernandes exploits FOIA requests to benefit
Obama’s leftwing allies. Specifically, sources say she
instructs Voting Section staffers to inform leftwing groups
about specific data from DOJ files that they might find useful
in advancing their agenda.”
Contrary
to some mainstream media reports, Adams documents that this kind of
radical, off the reservation politicization of the DOJ has never taken
place previously under any administration, Republican or Democrat that
he worked under.
What Adams describes is corruption at the
highest levels of government with the full support of Attorney General
Holder. It apparently exists on an unprecedented scale with the goal of
dishonestly affecting the outcome of the 2012 and future elections.
It’s what might be expected from Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, but not in
the United States of America. The defenders of the law have become the
law breakers according to Adams and they have the power and the will to
provide comfort and assistance to their allies as well as the power to
alter the outcome of the election process.
Buy this book! Read
this book. Liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, if you are
an honest person who believes in equal justice under the law you will be
shocked.
No comments:
Post a Comment